Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The author of this paper attempts to write about the mystery of the barzakh in and from Ibn al-Arab's perspective. Ibn al-Arab's perspective observes things from three dimensions: the two dimensions of the positive and negative, which are familiar to us by means of our ordinary binary perception, and in addition the third dimension that belongs neither to the one, nor to the other. This is the dimension of the barzakh, which can be called tertiary, since it is unitive and inclusive of the two familiar dimensions. "Seeing" the third dimension of the barzakh is not accessible to ordinary binary perception; it is accessible, according to Ibn al-Arab, only to those who possess a special kind of seeing; they are the ahl al-kashf, those who "see" with three eyes, as it were. Nevertheless, between the binary and the tertiary/unitive perceptions there is a pervasive tension of relatedness. It is a dynamic tension that makes its mark on all levels of existence, whether consciously or unconsciously. In other words, although the barzakh belongs to the dimension of the mysterious "third", it is powerfully present and influential all around. It manifests itself as the cognitive function that Ibn al-Arab calls 'imagination ' (al-khayl). For him, the barzakh-imagination is the most powerful cognitive function in the human makeup, and it hinges on a paradox: it makes everything that it conceives an "it/not it". God, too, from this perspective, is "He/not He". Following from the cognitive field that evolves from the tertiary-barzakh-imaginative perspective, I consider the notion coincidentia oppositorum ('the union of the opposites', al-jam bayna al-iddayn). Finally, I apply the insights stemming from Ibn al-Arab's perspective to the question of 'identities' and to the ethical dilemmas of our contemporary world.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sara Sviri (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: