PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 21, 2026Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and gastric cancer with supplementary clinical data

View Full Paper
QMQian MaZhuhai Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western MedicineYKYa-Fei KongZhuhai Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western MedicineALAi-Li LiZhuhai Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine

Structured PICO

Does genetic liability to gastric cancer affect the risk of hypertension or CAD, and does genetic predisposition to hypertension or CAD affect gastric cancer risk?

P
Population
GWAS summary statistics for gastric cancer, hypertension, and coronary artery disease, plus a supplementary retrospective cohort of 45 individuals (gastric cancer cases and non-cancer controls)
I
Intervention
Genetic liability to gastric cancer, hypertension, and coronary artery disease
C
Comparator
Genetic controls / non-cancer controls
O
Outcome
Risk of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and gastric cancerhard clinical

This Mendelian randomization study suggests an inverse genetic association between hypertension liability and gastric cancer risk, though clinical validation remains limited.

Limitations

  • Small sample size of the supplementary retrospective clinical analysis
  • Did not provide independent validation of the MR findings

Abstract

Background: The relationship between gastric cancer and cardiovascular traits, including hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD), remains incompletely understood. Observational studies are prone to confounding and reverse causation, and genetic evidence may help clarify the nature of these associations. Methods: We conducted a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics to investigate the relationships between gastric cancer, hypertension, and CAD. Multiple MR methods and sensitivity analyses were applied to assess robustness. To provide supplementary clinical context, we additionally conducted a small retrospective clinical analysis of 45 individuals, including gastric cancer cases and non-cancer controls, using logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. Results: MR analyses showed no evidence that genetic liability to gastric cancer was associated with the risk of hypertension or CAD. In contrast, genetic predisposition to hypertension was inversely associated with gastric cancer risk. These findings were consistent across sensitivity analyses. In the retrospective cohort, hypertension was not significantly associated with gastric cancer risk. Conclusions: This study provides genetic evidence supporting an inverse association between hypertension liability and gastric cancer risk. However, the supplementary retrospective clinical analysis was limited by its small sample size and did not provide independent validation of the MR findings. Larger observational studies are needed. Further studies are warranted to clarify the underlying biological mechanisms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a0f82b0d552aa8b4604a8https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1803696
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper