Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims. This study aimed to provide an in-depth analysis of e-learning and m-learning philosophy in the context of technology use in education. This research aimed to provide a deep and defined understanding of the impact of e-learning and m-learning philosophy in the context of education today. Methodology. The methodology used for this research was a literature review, which was oriented by a systematic and analytical approach, to identify, analyse and evaluate the relevant writings and studies in the field of e-learning and m-learning philosophy. Initially, the field of the study was identified and defined, including the main topics and concepts related to e-learning and m-learning philosophy. Through the content analysis, the main trends, differences, and challenges arising from these two learning modalities have been identified. Results. The results of the literature review served as a basis for further research in the field of education and technology, aspiring to contribute to the development of a comprehensive teaching approach that aligns with the needs of our rapidly advancing technological era. Scientific Novelty. One innovative aspect was the increased analysis of the synergy between e-learning and m-learning. This analysis went beyond a simple examination of the benefits and challenges of each, but also explored the shared opportunities that arose from their combination and matching, that could serve as a model for the development of a common learning approach. Conclusion. In conclusion, e-learning and m-learning philosophies serve as attractive paradigms for the use of technology in education. E-learning offers opportunities for research and advanced learning through online resources, while m-learning encourages active participation and the use of mobile technology for a personalised learning experience. These paradigms have a profound impact on students' critical and analytical skills, promoting a more dynamic and interactive approach to learning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Senad Orhani (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: