PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1991Annals of Internal Medicine479 citations

Use of an Artificial Neural Network for the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction

View Full Paper
WBWilliam G. Baxt

Key Result

An artificial neural network yielded higher diagnostic sensitivity (97.2% vs 77.7%, P=0.033) and specificity (96.2% vs 84.7%, P<0.001) for acute myocardial infarction compared to physicians.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=331)

Blinding

Blinded

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does an artificial neural network improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for acute myocardial infarction in adult patients presenting to an emergency department with anterior chest pain compared to physicians?

P
Population
331 consecutive adult patients presenting to an emergency department with anterior chest pain at a tertiary university teaching center
I
Intervention
Artificial neural network trained on clinical pattern sets retrospectively derived from 351 patients hospitalized with a high likelihood of having myocardial infarction
C
Comparator
Physicians caring for the same patients
O
Outcome
Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity with regard to the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarctionsurrogate

An artificial neural network demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity and specificity than physicians in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with anterior chest pain.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 97.2% vs 77.7%

p-value: p=0.033

Limitations

  • Must be confirmed through prospective testing on a larger patient sample

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate prospectively the use of an artificial neural network to identify myocardial infarction in patients presenting to an emergency department with anterior chest pain. DESIGN: Prospective, blinded testing. SETTING: Tertiary university teaching center. PATIENTS: A total of 331 consecutive adult patients presenting with anterior chest pain. MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity with regard to the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. MAIN RESULTS: An artificial neural network was trained on clinical pattern sets retrospectively derived from the cases of 351 patients hospitalized with a high likelihood of having myocardial infarction. It was prospectively tested on 331 consecutive patients presenting to an emergency department with anterior chest pain. The ability of the network to distinguish patients with from those without acute myocardial infarction was compared with that of physicians caring for the same patients. The physicians had a diagnostic sensitivity of 77.7% (95% CI, 77.0% to 82.9%) and a diagnostic specificity of 84.7% (CI, 84.0% to 86.4%). The artificial neural network had a sensitivity of 97.2% (CI, 97.2% to 97.5%; P = 0.033) and a specificity of 96.2% (CI, 96.2% to 96.4%; P less than 0.001). CONCLUSION: An artificial neural network trained to identify myocardial infarction in adult patients presenting to an emergency department may be a valuable aid to the clinical diagnosis of myocardial infarction; however, this possibility must be confirmed through prospective testing on a larger patient sample.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

William G. Baxt (1991) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=331). Artificial neural network vs. Physicians was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity for acute myocardial infarction (95% CI 97.2% to 97.5%, p=0.033). An artificial neural network yielded higher diagnostic sensitivity (97.2% vs 77.7%, P=0.033) and specificity (96.2% vs 84.7%, P<0.001) for acute myocardial infarction compared to physicians.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a32b730285ee4a13434f5https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-115-11-843
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper