Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Many low- and middle-income countries lag far behind high-income countries in educational access and student learning. Policymakers must make tough choices about which investments to make to improve education with limited resources. Although hundreds of education interventions have been rigorously evaluated, making comparisons between the results is challenging. This paper provides the most recent and comprehensive review of the literature on effective education programs, with a novel emphasis on cost-effectiveness. We analyze the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions from over 200 impact evaluations across 52 countries. We use a unified measure—learning-adjusted years of schooling (LAYS)—–that combines access and quality and compares gains to an absolute, cross-country standard. The results identify programs and policies that can be up to an order of magnitude more cost-effective than business-as-usual approaches, enabling policymakers to improve education outcomes substantially more efficiently. • Although hundreds of education interventions have been rigorously evaluated, making comparisons between the results remains challenging. • We analyze education policies and interventions from over 200 impact evaluations across 52 countries with a novel emphasis on cost-effectiveness. • We use a unified measure—learning-adjusted years of schooling (LAYS)–—that combines access and quality and compares gains to an absolute, cross-country standard. • Results identify programs and policies that can be up to an order of magnitude more cost-effective than business-as-usual approaches, enabling policymakers to improve education outcomes substantially more efficiently.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angrist et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: