This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The ideas and arguments associated with translanguaging have generated highly energized debates on a number of fundamental issues in linguistics, applied language studies and language education. Aspects of many long-held and apparently settled concepts such as ‘language/s’, ‘code switching’ and ‘Second Language Acquisition/Teaching’ have been fundamentally challenged. As has been acknowledged by scholars in the field, the discussions have at times led to polarized intellectual dispositions premised on particular disciplinary persuasions. In this Critical Review we offer a view from a language education perspective, with particular reference to additional/second/foreign language education in diverse socio-political contexts. We will first provide a historical context for the current debates on translanguaging by drawing attention to earlier efforts to make use of students’ own language to support additional language learning in an era of overwhelming monolingualism in language teaching. After that the discussion moves to the different approaches to translanguaging that have emerged and the pedagogic affordances and values attributed to them. In closing we raise a number conceptual and practice-related issues that would benefit from further deliberation and empirical research. Our view is that we are far from having exhausted the potentialities of translanguaging for educational development that may have impact beyond the classroom.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leung et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: