Why the study?
Breathing alterations affect RR interval variability on ECG, but there has been no method to record and control breathing without altering its natural rate and depth during HRV studies.
Does the Pneumonitor device provide valid RR interval and HRV measurements compared to standard ECG in pediatric cardiac patients?
Does the Pneumonitor device provide valid RR interval and HRV measurements compared to standard ECG in pediatric cardiac patients?
The Pneumonitor device is a valid tool for acquiring short-term RR intervals and heart rate variability data in resting pediatric cardiac patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support Pneumonitor for short-term HRV in resting pediatric cardiac patients; leaves open larger prospective validation before wider use.
BACKGROUND: Breathing pattern alterations change the variability and spectral content of the RR intervals (RRi) on electrocardiogram (ECG). However, there is no method to record and control participants' breathing without influencing its natural rate and depth in heart rate variability (HRV) studies. AIM: This study aimed to assess the validity of the Pneumonitor for acquisition of short-term (5 minutes) RRi in comparison to the reference ECG method for analysis of heart rate (HR) and HRV parameters in the group of pediatric patients with cardiac disease. METHODS: Nineteen patients of both sexes participated in the study. An ECG and Pneumonitor were used to record RRi in 5-minute static rest conditions, the latter also to measure the relative tidal volume and respiratory rate. The validation comprised Student's t-test, Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Lin's concordance correlation. The possible impact of respiratory activity on the agreement between ECG and the Pneumonitor was also assessed. RESULTS: An acceptable agreement for the number of RRi, mean RR, hazard ratio (HR), and HRV measures calculated based on RRi acquired using the ECG and Pneumonitor was presented. There was no association between the breathing pattern and RRi agreement between devices. CONCLUSIONS: The Pneumonitor might be considered appropriate for cardiorespiratory studies in the group of pediatric cardiac patients in rest condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gąsior et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: