Key result
CT left atrial shape plus clinical parameters predicts post-ablation AF recurrence with 0.78 AUC.
Why the study?
To investigate left atrial shape differences on pre-procedure CT scans between AF patients with and without post-ablation recurrence, and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence.
Does a machine learning model incorporating left atrial shape features from CT scans improve the prediction of AF recurrence following ablation compared to clinical factors alone?
Observational (n=68)
Does a machine learning model incorporating left atrial shape features from CT scans improve the prediction of AF recurrence following ablation compared to clinical factors alone?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.78
Machine learning analysis of left atrial shape on pre-ablation CT scans, combined with clinical factors, improves the prediction of AF recurrence at 1 year.
May refine pre-ablation AF recurrence risk assessment; leaves open prospective validation of added clinical value.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF-) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter ablation cardiac CT scans with contrast. AF recurrence was defined at 1 year, excluding a 3-month post-ablation blanking period. After creating atlases of atrial models from segmented AF+ and AF- CT images, an atlas-based implicit shape differentiation method was used to identify surface of interest (SOI). After registering the SOI to each patient model, statistics of the deformation on the SOI were used to create shape descriptors. The performance in predicting AF recurrence using shape features at and outside the SOI and eight clinical factors (age, sex, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, sinus rhythm, and AF type [persistent vs paroxysmal], catheter-ablation type [Cryoablation vs Irrigated RF]) were compared using 100 runs of fivefold cross validation. RESULTS: Differences in atrial shape were found surrounding the pulmonary vein ostia and the base of the left atrial appendage. In the prediction of AF recurrence, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.67 for shape features from the SOI, 0.58 for shape features outside the SOI, 0.71 for the clinical parameters, and 0.78 combining shape and clinical features. CONCLUSION: Differences in left atrial shape were identified between AF recurrent and non-recurrent patients using pre-procedure CT scans. New radiomic features corresponding to the differences in shape were found to predict post-ablation AF recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atta-Fosu et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=68). Machine learning approach using left atrial shape features from CT combined with clinical parameters vs. Clinical parameters alone or shape features alone was evaluated on Prediction of AF recurrence at 1 year (AUC 0.78). Combining left atrial shape features from pre-procedure CT scans with clinical parameters predicted post-ablation atrial fibrillation recurrence with an AUC of 0.78.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: