Why the study?
Does bepridil improve conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Does bepridil improve conversion to sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
While bepridil demonstrates a dose-dependent efficacy in converting persistent atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, its clinical utility is severely limited by high recurrence rates and significant proarrhythmic risks, including sudden death.
Bepridil converts persistent AF to sinus rhythm; confirms dose-dependent efficacy but proarrhythmic risks limit clinical use.
BACKGROUND: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted with patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) to determine the dose-response effects and safety of bepridil, using every-day transtelephonic monitorings. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were randomized to receive placebo, 100 mg/day and 200 mg/day of bepridil treatment for 12 weeks. After the treatment, those patients who converted to sinus rhythm was 3.4% in placebo, 37.5% in those who received 100 mg/day and 69.0% in those who received 200 mg/day, thus demonstrating a linear dose-response relationship for AF conversion. The conversion rate gradually reached a maximal value at approximately 6 weeks after initiation of bepridil. However, the AF recurrence rate was high (91.7% in those receiving 100 mg/day and 75.0% in those receiving 200 mg/day). Adverse events, presumably related to the drug, were also frequent: ventricular tachycardia in 2, QT prolongation in 4 and sinus bradycardia in 2 patients. In those patients treated with 200 mg/day group, 1 patient died suddenly because of ventricular tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the dose response-relationships of bepridil for AF conversion to sinus rhythm. However, the high rate of AF recurrence and substantial drug-related adverse effects, including sudden death, raised caution about using bepridil to treat persistent AF. The balance between benefits and risks of the drug should be individualized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: