Key result
2D and 3D echo serve as the primary imaging modalities to diagnose and assess mitral stenosis.
Why the study?
Mitral stenosis is a significant cause of heart valve disease globally, and echocardiography is the primary modality to diagnose, evaluate morphology, and assess severity and hemodynamic consequences.
What is the role of 2D and 3D echocardiography in the evaluation of mitral stenosis?
What is the role of 2D and 3D echocardiography in the evaluation of mitral stenosis?
This review highlights the sufficiency of transthoracic echocardiography for managing most patients with mitral stenosis and discusses the roles of 2D and 3D imaging.
Transthoracic echocardiography suffices for most mitral stenosis cases; leaves open the incremental value of 3D refinements in routine practice.
Mitral stenosis is an important cause of heart valve disease globally. Echocardiography is the main imaging modality used to diagnose and assess the severity and hemodynamic consequences of mitral stenosis as well as valve morphology. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is sufficient for the management of most patients. The focus of this review is the role of current two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic imaging for the evaluation of mitral stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruiz et al. (2021) conducted a review in Mitral stenosis. 2D and 3D echocardiography was evaluated. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiography serve as the primary imaging modalities for diagnosing and assessing the severity and morphology of mitral stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: