Key result
HybridCNN outperforms other algorithms for heart audio classification, achieving ~86% precision for murmurs.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular diseases are a major cause of global mortality, making approaches that assist in preliminary identification of heart disease critical.
A HybridCNN model can effectively classify heart audio samples into normal, murmur, and artifact categories with high precision, potentially assisting in early detection of heart disease.
Cardiovascular diseases have been a major cause of deaths amongst the world population. Approximately 17.1 million cases of deaths due to CVD were reported in 2004, this accounts for 29% of the global deaths. Nearly 7.2 million of these cases were related to myocardial heart disease. Thus any approach that could assist in identification of heart disease at preliminary stage is of the utmost importance in improving this elevating index. The work is an advancement in this domain by providing an approach for classification of heart audio samples using some state of the art deep learning techniques. It aims at implementing some existing segmentation techniques along with feature engineering in the audio domain. It also involves a comparative analysis of some existing machine learning algorithms like Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gradient boosting trees, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) along with the deep learning techniques like Convolutional networks(CNN), and recurrent networks like simple Recurrent Neural Networks(RNN), Long Short Term Memory(LSTM). The precision values used to report the model performance comes out to be best for the HybridCNN with about precision of 1 for artifact, 0.906 for normal and 0.859 for murmur category.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taneja et al. (2020) studied Cardiovascular diseases. HybridCNN vs. Machine learning algorithms (SVM, XGBoost, RNN, LSTM) was evaluated on Precision for heart audio classification. A HybridCNN model achieved the best performance for heart audio classification compared to other algorithms, with precision values of 1 for artifact, 0.906 for normal, and 0.859 for murmur.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: