Key result
Combining multiple time-frequency representations with CNNs achieves ~99% heart sound classification accuracy versus individual methods.
Why the study?
Automated heart sound analysis offers an accessible way to support cardiac diagnosis, as cardiac auscultation provides a non-invasive, cost-effective initial assessment of cardiac health.
Does combining multiple time-frequency representations improve the accuracy of deep-learning models in classifying heart sounds?
Does combining multiple time-frequency representations improve the accuracy of deep-learning models in classifying heart sounds?
Combining multiple time-frequency representations significantly improves the accuracy of deep-learning models for automated heart sound classification.
Worldwide, heart disease is the leading cause of mortality. Cardiac auscultation, when conducted by a trained professional, is a non-invasive, cost-effective, and readily available method for the initial assessment of cardiac health. Automated heart sound analysis offers a promising and accessible approach to supporting cardiac diagnosis. This work introduces a novel method for classifying heart sounds as normal or abnormal by leveraging time-frequency representations. Our approach combines three distinct time-frequency representations—short-time Fourier transform (STFT), mel-scale spectrogram, and wavelet synchrosqueezed transform (WSST)—to create images that enhance classification performance. These images are used to train five convolutional neural networks (CNNs): AlexNet, VGG-16, ResNet50, a CNN specialized in STFT images, and our proposed CNN model. The method was trained and tested using three public heart sound datasets: PhysioNet/CinC Challenge 2016, CirCor DigiScope Phonocardiogram Dataset 2022, and another open database. While individual representations achieve maximum accuracy of ≈85.9%, combining STFT, mel, and WSST boosts accuracy to ≈99%. By integrating complementary time-frequency features, our approach demonstrates robust heart sound analysis, achieving consistent classification performance across diverse CNN architectures, thus ensuring reliability and generalizability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orozco-Reyes et al. (2025) studied Heart disease (normal vs abnormal heart sounds). Combined time-frequency representations (STFT, mel-scale spectrogram, WSST) with CNNs vs. Individual time-frequency representations was evaluated on Classification accuracy for normal vs abnormal heart sounds. Combining STFT, mel-scale spectrogram, and WSST time-frequency representations with CNNs achieved ≈99% accuracy in classifying heart sounds, compared to ≈85.9% for individual representations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: