Why the study?
Most lifestyle scores are primarily developed for single non-communicable diseases, leaving their potential to predict the risk of multiple disease endpoints unclear.
Do lifestyle scores estimate the risk of multiple non-communicable disease-related endpoints?
Do lifestyle scores estimate the risk of multiple non-communicable disease-related endpoints?
Simple lifestyle scores can effectively estimate the risk of multiple non-communicable disease endpoints, with scores including additional risk factors showing stronger predictive ability.
Supports multi-disease risk stratification with simple scores in practice; extends evidence to simultaneous cancer, CVD, and T2D endpoints.
Background Lifestyle scores have emerged as a practical tool to assess the risk of major non-communicable diseases (NCDs). However, most of them are primarily developed for single NCDs. Given the common risk factors for some of the major NCDs, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the potential of existing lifestyle scores in predicting the risk of multiple NCD-related endpoints. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to October 2024. We included observational studies assessing the association between lifestyle scores and the risk of morbidity or mortality of multiple NCDs, including type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer. Results Of 16,138 unique records identified by the search, 56 eligible studies were included in the systematic review, consisting of 48 cohort studies, 5 case-control studies, 2 case-cohort studies, and 1 cross-sectional study from 16 countries. 15 lifestyle scores were identified to estimate the risk of 32 NCDs, with HLI BMI being the most reported score (14/56, 25.0%). Moderate to strong associations were found between the 15 lifestyle scores and the risk of developing and dying from multiple types of cancers, CVDs, and T2D. Healthy lifestyle scores including additional risk factors (i.e., blood pressure, blood glucose, and waist circumference) aside from major risk factors (i.e., Body Mass Index (BMI), smoking, and diet) seemed to have a stronger ability to estimate NCDs risk than scores including only major risk factors. Conclusion All 15 simple lifestyle scores were shown to estimate the risk of multiple NCDs endpoints, although some scores were originally developed to estimate the risk of single diseases only. Therefore, further research is required to identify which lifestyle score is most effective for assessing the risk of multiple NCD-related endpoints in a head-to-head comparison.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: