Key result
Single noninvasive ECG markers fail to identify high-risk DCM patients for ICD implantation.
Why the study?
Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in dilated cardiomyopathy is debated, and currently proposed criteria have been questioned due to low positive and negative predictive values.
Do noninvasive electrocardiographic risk markers predict sudden cardiac death in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
Systematic Review (n=44)
Do noninvasive electrocardiographic risk markers predict sudden cardiac death in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy?
No single noninvasive electrocardiographic risk marker is sufficient to select patients with dilated cardiomyopathy for primary prevention ICD implantation.
Avoid relying on any single ECG marker for ICD selection in dilated cardiomyopathy; confirms inadequacy of univariate approaches for risk stratification.
Risk stratification for sudden cardiac death in dilated cardiomyopathy is a field of constant debate, and the currently proposed criteria have been widely questioned due to their low positive and negative predictive value. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature utilizing the PubMed and Cochrane library platforms, in order to gain insight about dilated cardiomyopathy and its arrhythmic risk stratification utilizing noninvasive risk markers derived mainly from 24 h electrocardiographic monitoring. The obtained articles were reviewed in order to register the various electrocardiographic noninvasive risk factors used, their prevalence, and their prognostic significance in dilated cardiomyopathy. Premature ventricular complexes, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, late potentials on Signal averaged electrocardiography, T wave alternans, heart rate variability and deceleration capacity of the heart rate, all have both some positive and negative predictive value to identify patients in higher likelihood for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Corrected QT, QT dispersion, and turbulence slope-turbulence onset of heart rate have yet to establish a predictive correlation in the literature. Although ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring is frequently used in clinical practice in DCM patients, no single risk marker can be used for the selection of patients at high-risk for malignant ventricular arrhythmic events and sudden cardiac death who could benefit from the implantation of a defibrillator. More studies are needed in order to establish a risk score or a combination of risk factors with the purpose of selecting high-risk patients for ICD implantation in the context of primary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milaras et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=44). Noninvasive electrocardiographic risk factors (e.g., TWA, NSVT, SAECG, HRV) was evaluated on Sudden cardiac death or ventricular arrhythmias. No single noninvasive electrocardiographic risk marker can be used alone to select high-risk dilated cardiomyopathy patients for implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: