Key result
Single-bolus lanoteplase showed a dose-response for TIMI 3 flow at 60 mins (P<0.001) and at 120 kU/kg was superior to alteplase for patency at 90 mins (83% vs 71.4%; 95% CI 1-23%).
Why the study?
Does single-bolus lanoteplase improve TIMI grade flow at 60 minutes compared to accelerated alteplase in patients presenting within 6 hours of acute myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=602)
double-blind, double-placebo
randomized
Yes
Does single-bolus lanoteplase improve TIMI grade flow at 60 minutes compared to accelerated alteplase in patients presenting within 6 hours of acute myocardial infarction?
Single-bolus lanoteplase demonstrated a dose-dependent improvement in early coronary patency, achieving superior patency at 90 minutes compared to alteplase in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May simplify early AMI reperfusion via single-bolus dosing; extends tPA variant data beyond alteplase on patency.
BACKGROUND: Lanoteplase (nPA) is a rationally designed variant of tissue plasminogen activator with greater fibrinolytic potency and slower plasma clearance than alteplase. METHODS AND RESULTS: InTIME (Intravenous nPA for Treatment of Infarcting Myocardium Early), a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, double-placebo angiographic trial, evaluated the dose-response relationship and safety of single-bolus, weight-adjusted lanoteplase. Patients (n=602) presenting within 6 hours of acute myocardial infarction were randomized and treated with either a single-bolus injection of lanoteplase (15, 30, 60, or 120 kU/kg) or accelerated alteplase. The primary objective was to determine TIMI grade flow at 60 minutes. Angiographic assessments were also performed at 90 minutes and on days 3 to 5. Follow-up was continued for 30 days. Lanoteplase achieved its primary objective, demonstrating a dose-response in TIMI grade 3 flow at 60 minutes (23.6% to 47.1% of subjects, P<0. 001). Similar results were observed at 90 minutes (26.1% to 57.1%, P<0.001). At 90 minutes, coronary patency (TIMI 2 or 3) increased across the dose range up to 83% of subjects at 120 kU/kg lanoteplase compared with 71.4% with alteplase. Thus, at this dose, lanoteplase was superior to alteplase in restoring coronary patency (difference, 12%; 95% CI, 1% to 23%). The early safety experience in this study suggests that lanoteplase was well tolerated at all doses with safety comparable to that of alteplase. CONCLUSIONS: Lanoteplase, a single-bolus, weight-adjusted agent, increased coronary patency at 60 and 90 minutes in a dose-dependent fashion. Coronary patency at 90 minutes was achieved more frequently with 120 kU/kg lanoteplase than alteplase. In this study, safety with lanoteplase and alteplase was comparable. InTIME-II, a worldwide mortality trial, will evaluate efficacy and safety with this promising new agent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heijer et al. (1998) conducted an RCT in acute myocardial infarction (n=602). lanoteplase vs. accelerated alteplase was evaluated on TIMI grade flow at 60 minutes (p=<0.001). Single-bolus lanoteplase showed a dose-response for TIMI 3 flow at 60 mins (P<0.001) and at 120 kU/kg was superior to alteplase for patency at 90 mins (83% vs 71.4%; 95% CI 1-23%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: