Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined the chemical composition, bioactive compounds, antioxidant activity of Acacia nilotica seed powder (ANS), and its effects on hypercholesterolemic rats over four weeks. Thirty-six rats were acclimated on a basal diet (BD) for two weeks, then divided into groups: a negative control on BD, a positive control fed a hypercholesterolemic diet (HCD) for 3 weeks, followed by BD, and three treatment groups receiving BD with 5%, 7%, and 9% ANS. Proximate analysis of ANS revealed 8.27% moisture, 9.43% crude fat, 27.13% protein, and 39.44% carbohydrates, indicating high nutritional value. Bioactive compounds included polysaccharides, polyphenols, saponins, alkaloids, flavonoids, and kaempferol, with low oxalates and tannins within safe limits. Antioxidant activity was 66.89%, comparable to standard antioxidants. ANS treatment improved metabolic parameters dose-dependently. Body weight gain (BWG), reduced by ~40% in untreated rats, improved by 10%, 20%, and 43% at 3, 6, and 9 g/100 g ANS, respectively. Feed intake and feed efficiency ratio similarly recovered. Liver enzymes AST, ALT, and ALP, elevated in the model by 39.8%, 61.8%, and 16.6%, decreased significantly with 9 g ANS by 22.1%, 95.5%, and 10.7%. Serum triglycerides and total cholesterol, increased by ~181% and 38%, declined dose-dependently with ANS, with TG dropping by ~260% and TC by ~22.7% at 9 g. HDL cholesterol rose by 25%, 37%, and 72%, while LDL and VLDL cholesterol fell by up to 44% and 41%. Glutathione levels (GSH and GSSG) improved, reversing 23.14% and 19.84% declines in controls. Erythrocyte antioxidant enzymes (GSH-Px, GSH-Rd, SOD, CAT) decreased by 25–38% in controls but increased by 23–45% with ANS. Oxidative stress markers ROS and MDA, elevated by 45% and 62.48%, were reduced dose-dependently, with MDA decreasing by 42.89% at the highest dose. These results demonstrate ANS’s potent antioxidant and lipid-lowering effects in hypercholesterolemic rats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elhassaneen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: