Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The proposed detector uses three vector samples to decide which one of two distinct stationary or quasi-stationary stochastic processes is present at its input. A reference sample is obtained from each of the two processes during an initial learning interval, and the third sample is taken on the decision interval. It is assumed that independent samples can be obtained from the stochastic processes. A weighted linear combination of two <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</tex> -sample Mann-Whitney statistics defined on the three vector samples is used at the detector. An upper bound on the asymptotic or large-sample error probability is obtained, which indicates that, unlike the <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</tex> -sample detector, the new detector is insensitive to the { a priori} signal probability and operates well in an unspecified environment. Comparisons are made between the proposed model and the standard <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</tex> -sample model at both small and large values of signal-to-noise ratio. An extension to intermediate values of signal-to-noise ratio is obtained by considering two examples, dc signal in additive noise and Lehmann's nonparametric class of alternatives. Owing mainly to an invariant optimum threshold setting, the proposed procedure results in a significantly better performance over a wide range of signal-to-noise ratio.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woinsky et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: