Key result
Aortic valve replacement significantly reduced left ventricular mass index from 212.3 g/m2 to 125.5 g/m2 at one year postoperatively in patients with isolated aortic regurgitation.
Why the study?
Does aortic valve replacement reduce left ventricular mass in patients with isolated aortic regurgitation?
Cohort (n=61)
No
Does aortic valve replacement reduce left ventricular mass in patients with isolated aortic regurgitation?
Aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic regurgitation results in significant regression of left ventricular mass at 1 year, though it does not completely normalize compared to healthy controls.
AVR associated with LVMI regression in isolated AR; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before practice change.
Background: The aim of our study was to assess the extent of regression of left ventricular mass after aortic valve replacement in isolated aortic regurgitation. Material and Method: Retrospective analysis of echocardiographic data was collected preoperative and postoperative 1 year. There were 20 patients (12 males, 8 females, mean age 55.8±11.8 years, mean body surface area 1.64±0.19 ㎡) with aortic regurgitation from 2002 through 2007. We studied the change of left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular septum and left ventricular posterior wall thickness, and left vemtricular muscle index (LVMI). The control group was age matched with normal echocardiographic study results. Patients with combined surgery or infective endocarditis were excluded. Result: Seven cases of tissue valves and thirteen cases of mechanical valve were used. The valve sizes were 21 mm (3 cases), 23 ㎜ (13 cases) and 25 ㎜ (4 cases). The postoperative (125.5±42 g/㎡) LVMI has decreased than preoperative LVMI (212.3±80 g/㎡, p=0.000) but higher than that of control group (80.5±15.9 g/㎡, p=0.000). Postoperative septal wall (systolic/diastolic: 13.5±3.4 ㎜/17.1±4.1 ㎜) and left ventricular posterior wall (systolic/diastolic: 12.9±3.4 ㎜/16.7±3.4 ㎜) thickness were slightly decreased after the valve replacement but was not significantly different than preoperative levels. And postoperative interventricular septal wall and left ventricular posterior wall thickness (systolic/diastolic: 8.6±1.4 ㎜/12.1±1.7 ㎜, systolic/diastolic: 8.4±1.4/13.2±1.9) were higher than that of the control group (p<0.001). Conclusion: The significant regression of LVMI after aortic valve replacement developed at postoperative one year but the level was higher than control group. The main cause of decreased LVMI is decreased in left ventricular dimension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Isolated aortic regurgitation (n=61). Aortic valve replacement vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (p=0.002). Aortic valve replacement significantly reduced left ventricular mass index from 212.3 g/m2 to 125.5 g/m2 at one year postoperatively in patients with isolated aortic regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: