Qualitative study explores e-cigarette use in female Chinese Indonesian college students, suggesting socialization drives vaping behaviors.
INTRODUCTION International students navigate health behaviors across different cultural and regulatory environments, yet their e-cigarette use remains understudied.This qualitative study explores e-cigarette use among female Chinese Indonesian college students in China, examining how acculturation experiences and gendered social norms shape vaping behaviors.METHODS This qualitative study was conducted at a university in Fujian Province, China, in October 2024, employing Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).Three female Chinese Indonesian college students (aged 18-21 years) were purposively selected from a larger survey (n=45) based on Indonesian nationality with Chinese ancestry, female gender, current e-cigarette use, and willingness to participate.Semi-structured interviews were supplemented by questionnaire data assessing acculturation difficulties, psychological well-being (CES-D-10), and social support.Analysis followed Smith's IPA procedures with Berry's acculturation framework as an interpretive lens.RESULTS Four main themes emerged: 1) Social initiation and peer-embedded use -initiated through peer influence in Indonesian high schools and maintained within co-national networks in China; 2) Acculturation stressors without stresscoping use -participants described e-cigarette use as unrelated to academic pressure, language barriers, and loneliness; 3) Navigating gendered social norms -China was perceived as more permissive, with use concealed from families; and 4) Habituated practice and flavor preferences -use was framed as habit, with fruit flavor preferences driving cross-border sourcing.CONCLUSIONS E-cigarette use among these students appears to be shaped by peer socialization and habit formation rather than acculturative stress; future longitudinal, multi-site studies with larger samples are needed to examine these patterns among broader international student populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: