Systematic review reveals one in ten high-impact clinical trials conducted without informed consent, suggesting regulatory gaps.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently harmonized its regulatory criteria for waivers and alterations of informed consent with the U.S. Common Rule.We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials in the two highest-impact clinical journals in the U.S. to better understand practice-changing trials that are being conducted in the U.S. without prospective written informed consent.One in ten trials in our sample were conducted without prospective written informed consent.Such trials accounted for 93.1% of patientsubjects in
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Propes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: