Demonstrates reduced energy consumption in IIoT via adaptive sampling, indicating potential efficiency gains.
To mitigate resource waste and information loss in fixed-frequency sampling for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), this paper proposes a collaborative framework integrating dynamic perception with adaptive sampling. By incorporating the multi-dimensional state perception results of the dynamic perception model into the reinforcement learning state space, the proposed framework aims to facilitate a transition from a signal-driven to a cognition-driven sampling approach. Specifically, we develop the Learnable Decomposition Dual-branch Network (LD-DualNet), which decouples time-series signals via learnable decomposition into trend components reflecting long-term global variation laws and seasonal components capturing short-term local periodic fluctuations, and employs a dual-branch architecture combining Transformer with CNN-BiLSTM for feature extraction. Furthermore, a Deep Q-Network (DQN) optimizes sampling strategies via a semantic-signal dual feedback mechanism integrating semantic-level state criticality and signal-level data fluctuation feedback, optimizing high-level semantic planning while satisfying low-level signal constraints. Experimental results on three public datasets show LD-DualNet achieves 97.59% classification accuracy, with adaptive sampling reducing energy consumption by 36.6%–65.2%. The coefficient of determination (R²) exceeds 0.90, and the ratio of sampling density in critical and non-critical states is over 2.0, which reflects a tendency toward targeted sampling resource allocation. Practical validation on a rubber production line indicates a 45% data reduction does not notably compromise the performance of downstream forecasting and anomaly detection tasks, which provides empirical support for the industrial applicability of the proposed approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: