Evaluates surface roughness and color stability of CAD/CAM materials after coffee immersion, suggesting effective polishing strategies.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of simulated clinical abrasion followed by manufacturer- recommended and universal chairside polishing kits on the surface roughness of various CAD/CAM restorative materials and on their color stability after coffee immersion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 specimens were analyzed for surface roughness and color stability. Specimens were fabricated from four CAD/CAM materials: lithium disilicate (IE), resin nanoceramics (SH, CS), and a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (VE). All specimens were standardized, abraded using a fine-grit diamond bur, and polished with either manufacturer-recommended or universal polishing kits. Surface roughness was measured at baseline (Ra0), after abrasion (Ra1), and after polishing (Ra2). Color measurements were performed using a spectrophotometer, and color differences (ΔE₀₀) were calculated after 60 days of coffee immersion. Statistical analyses were conducted using paired t-tests and two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Baseline roughness values were similar among groups (p > 0.05). Polishing significantly reduced Ra in all materials (p < 0.001). The reduction in roughness (ΔRa) was greater in the manufacturer-recommended groups than in the universal groups (p < 0.001), with the highest values observed in CS and SH. Both material type and polishing kits significantly affected color change (ΔE₀₀) (p < 0.001), with a significant interaction between the factors (p < 0.05). The lowest ΔE₀₀ values were recorded in IE, whereas the highest values were observed in SH. CONCLUSIONS: CAD/CAM material type and polishing kits significantly affected surface roughness and color stability. Lithium disilicate showed the highest color stability despite the greatest roughness. Manufacturer-recommended polishing kits yielded lower roughness and better color stability than the universal kit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hazir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: