PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Growth and Change1 citations

Beyond Beneficiaries: Spatial Spillover Effects of Social Safety Nets on Food Security in Malawi

View Full Paper
NNNomore NkhomaXCXiaonan ChenMWMingyue Wu

Key Points

  • This research investigates the effects of social safety nets on food security and dietary diversity in Malawi, emphasizing community-level impacts.
  • Utilized a balanced panel dataset from the Malawi Integrated Household Panel Survey from 2010–2019.
  • Employed a Spatial Durbin Difference-in-Differences framework combined with propensity score matching.
  • Conducted focused analysis on the Social Cash Transfer program to evaluate direct and spillover effects.
  • SSN participation significantly increased dietary diversity among beneficiary households (p<0.05).
  • Positive spillover effects noted in neighboring non-beneficiary households, enhancing community dietary diversity.
  • The Social Cash Transfer program displayed significant positive effects, affirming that findings are not due to program aggregation.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Persistent food insecurity continues to undermine development of low‐income countries despite significant investments in social protection programs. While social safety net (SSN) programs aim to stabilize household welfare, their broader community‐level effects remain underexplored. Using a balanced panel dataset from the Malawi Integrated Household Panel Survey (IHPS) from 2010–2019, we employ a Spatial Durbin Difference‐in‐Differences framework (SDM‐DID) combined with propensity score matching. Baseline estimates from two‐way fixed effects (TWFE) and Extended TWFE (ETWFE), which accounts for staggered treatment timing, both indicate positive and statistically significant effects of SSN participation on dietary diversity. The SDM‐DID results show that SSN participation improves dietary diversity among beneficiary households and generates positive spillovers to neighboring non‐beneficiary households. A focused analysis on the Social Cash Transfer program (SCTP) yields positive direct and spillover effects, confirming that results are not driven by program aggregation. Spillover effects are amplified through social networks, household income, and market access. Heterogeneity analysis suggests similar effects across gender with limited statistically differences. Regionally, effects are more pronounced in the Central and Southern regions. The findings highlight the importance of spatial spillovers in shaping program impacts, suggesting that SSNs can generate community‐wide improvements in food and nutrition security.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nkhoma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aac955ba8ef6d83b6ffedhttps://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70138
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper