Narrative review examines COVID-19's effects on ICUs, highlighting necessary adaptations and resilience strategies.
Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, was first identified in late 2019 and went on to profoundly disrupt health care systems worldwide. The pandemic led to unprecedented increases in healthcare delivery costs, widespread disruption in medical supply chains, workforce instability, and a loss of typical inpatient caregiver support. These challenges affected all levels of care, from primary health services to highly specialized intensive care units (ICUs). Before vaccines were available, ICUs were overwhelmed by critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation, saturating capacity and straining staff. Objectives This article seeks to examine the effect that COVID-19 had on ICUs globally, acknowledging its impact with an aim to identify solutions that can be used to help mitigate the overburdening of this limited resource in future pandemics. Methods A narrative review approach was used, drawing on published literature, observational data, and institutional responses from 2020 to 2025, to analyze structural, operational, and clinical adjustments in ICU design and function. Results Key adaptations included physical redesigns, rapid infection-control upgrades, the use of negative pressure rooms, expansion of tele-ICU systems, and virtual family engagement strategies. These interventions were implemented to address ICU crowding, equipment shortages, and staff burnout, and helped to maintain continuity of care during surge conditions. Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the need for ICUs to be more agile, scalable, and future-facing. Lessons learned highlight the importance of preparedness strategies that strengthen ICU resilience and support critical care delivery in future public health emergencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamikanra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: