Key result
Pharmacy-based HbA1c testing is linked to ~2-fold higher digital diabetes prevention program engagement vs GP referral.
Why the study?
Does a pharmacy-based point-of-care HbA1c testing pathway improve detection of prediabetes and engagement with a digital prevention programme compared to GP-based identification in high-risk adults?
Population
Adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes, identified using the Diabetes UK 'Know Your Risk' tool.
Comparison
Pharmacy-based pathway using verified… vs General Practitioner patients identified for…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Community pharmacy-based point-of-care HbA1c testing effectively identifies prediabetes and undiagnosed T2D in underserved populations, doubling engagement with digital prevention programs compared to standard GP pathways.
Observational (n=1,450)
Yes
Does a pharmacy-based point-of-care HbA1c testing pathway improve detection of prediabetes and engagement with a digital prevention programme compared to GP-based identification in high-risk adults?
Relative Risk: 2.08 (95% CI 1.61–2.67)
Absolute Event Rate: 51% vs 32%
Community pharmacy-based point-of-care HbA1c testing effectively identifies prediabetes and undiagnosed T2D in underserved populations, doubling engagement with digital prevention programs compared to standard GP pathways.
Radley et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Prediabetes and undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (n=1,450). Pharmacy-based point-of-care HbA1c testing pathway vs. GP-based identification was evaluated on Engagement with a digital diabetes prevention programme (DPP) (RR 2.08, 95% CI 1.61-2.67). A community pharmacy-based HbA1c testing pathway doubled engagement with a digital diabetes prevention program compared to GP-based identification (51% vs 32%; RR 2.08; 95% CI 1.61-2.67).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: