Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic documentation of how vulnerable individuals with NCD are portrayed, suggesting improvements in communication.
Aims To systematically document how individuals in vulnerable positions with diabetes or other non‐communicable diseases (NCD) are portrayed in texts from Danish health care institutions. Methods Our dataset consists of texts from Steno Diabetes Center Sjælland (SDCS) and 10 other Danish institutions related to diabetes and/or health care. We searched for text excerpts that referred to NCD and contained words with the meaning ‘vulnerable’/‘vulnerability’. Through semantic analysis, we systematically categorised the semantic roles of referents in the texts, e.g. whether a person was framed as performing an action (having an ACTOR role) or as undergoing an action (having a role as UNDERGOER). Results We found 1645 examples where persons were referred to as vulnerable (e.g. ‘vulnerable families’ or ‘men in vulnerable positions’). The semantic text analysis of these examples showed that Danish health care institutions consistently portray these individuals as UNDERGOERS, who are passive participants in their own lives and treatment. They are rarely portrayed as making positive differences or being part of positive relations. Conclusion There is a discrepancy between the goal that individuals with diabetes and NCD are motivated to take action, and the low‐agency language that the investigated Danish health care institutions use in relation to individuals in vulnerable positions with NCD including diabetes. We recommend strategically replacing low‐agency predicates with words that position individuals with diabetes as acting intentionally and being capable of self‐care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ursbak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: