Conceptual analysis reinterprets audience engagement mechanisms, highlighting pathways for social impact.
Digital Sidewalk Series Note: this preprint is one element of a conceptual series asking how systems receive, filter, store, and transmit energy or information across domains. W. J. Brown's (2015) four-process model of audience involvement with media personae distinguishes transportation, parasocial interaction, identification, and worship as separable forms of media engagement. Recent meta-analytic work continues to demonstrate that mediated narratives produce persuasive effects, but those effects vary by boundary conditions, resistance, time course, and construct overlap (Oschatz & Marker, 2020; Ratcliff & Sun, 2020; Tukachinsky, Walter, & Saucier, 2020; Doré et al., 2025; Rahmani, Montano, Groves, & Green, 2025). This paper argues that the field would benefit from a more precise vocabulary for describing how mediated narratives become socially consequential through different routes. This paper proposes a cautious cybernetic reading of Brown's four processes as coupling architectures. A coupling architecture is a structured account of how a media signal becomes consequential through a patterned arrangement of source, signal, receiver, relation, and feedback. The framework draws on two traditions: Gordon Pask's Conversation Theory (Pask, 1976) and Interaction of Actors Theory (Pask & de Zeeuw, 1992; de Zeeuw, 2001), which treat learning and meaning as emerging through structured interactions among actors rather than through one-way transmission; and the Kelly–Lochbaum acoustic-tube tradition (Kelly & Lochbaum, 1962a, 1962b; Strube, 2000), which formalizes how signals propagate through segmented systems with junctions, impedance changes, and reflections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denise McDonough (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: