Database analysis identifies orofacial dysfunction in congenital or childhood-onset neuromuscular disorders, suggesting significant prevalence.
Background Some symptoms of orofacial dysfunction, such as dysphagia and dysarthria, are commonly encountered in congenital or childhood-onset neuromuscular diseases (NMD), while others, such as reduced saliva control and difficulties using facial expressions, are not as well researched. Overall, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the extents to which different orofacial functions are affected in persons with NMD. Objective To identify orofacial dysfunction profiles at group level for congenital or childhood-onset NMD. Methods This database study included 206 individuals in the age range of 3–48 years with 21 different congenital or childhood-onset NMD, categorized as anterior horn cell diseases, neuropathies and myopathies. Orofacial dysfunction profiles from the Nordic Orofacial Test - Screening were extracted from a national database of oral health and orofacial functions in rare health conditions. Results In the study population, 70% presented with signs of orofacial dysfunction. Neuropathies had the lowest rate of orofacial dysfunctions (25%), followed by myopathies (72%). Anterior horn cell diseases had the highest rate of orofacial dysfunctions (82%). In all the groups, there were individuals without orofacial dysfunction, except for the subgroups of Spinal Muscular Atrophy type 1 and Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy with age range of 19–49 years in which all the participants (100%) demonstrated orofacial dysfunction according to NOT-S. Conclusions This study identifies a considerable proportion of individuals with congenital and childhood-onset NMD exhibiting signs of orofacial dysfunction, indicating the need for further investigation. It also shows to what extents different orofacial functions are affected in subgroups of NMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bengtsson-Stelzer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: