Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The RemNavi methodology outlines data aggregation and scoring for remote jobs, enabling transparency and reproducibility in analyses.
RemNavi is an open remote-job-market index. It aggregates publicly accessible remote job listings from seven major remote job boards and ATS platforms - Jobicy, Remote OK, We Work Remotely, Remotive, Greenhouse, Lever, and Hacker News Who's Hiring - supplemented by specialised boards (Himalayas, Working Nomads, Arbeitnow, 4 Day Week, Crypto Jobs List, Golang Projects, Python.org Jobs, VueJobs, and the Ashby ATS) and over sixty direct employer ATS career pages. As of 2026-05-15 the corpus contains approximately 8,750 live listings. Every listing is scored on the Real Remote Score (RRS), a public 100-point five-pillar transparency rubric (Compensation 30; Location 25; Source 20; Role clarity 15; Freshness 10). Hybrid roles additionally carry a parallel Hybrid Transparency Score (HTS). This document is v1 of the RemNavi methodology. It covers: source inventory and inclusion criteria; ingestion cadence; deduplication; salary data treatment and the Remote Salary Index; the RRS and HTS scoring rubrics; scope and boundaries; the commercial model and editorial firewall; limitations and known biases; data availability and reproducibility; and the open-data licence. The methodology is designed to allow third-party researchers, journalists, and data scientists to reproduce, audit, and cite RemNavi's measurements of the remote job market - in particular for analyses connected to the EU Pay Transparency Directive (Directive (EU) 2023/970). The underlying dataset is published continuously under CC BY 4.0 at: Remote Salary Index (CSV + JSON): https://remnavi.com/tools/salary-index/ Market Index: https://remnavi.com/market-index/ Trends API: https://remnavi.com/trends/ The live, continuously updated methodology is at https://remnavi.com/methodology/. The full Real Remote Score rubric is at https://remnavi.com/real-remote-score-methodology/. Subsequent revisions will be deposited as new versions of this Zenodo record.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dezso Mezo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: