Key result
RFA and ICD hospitalization costs greatly exceed current PhilHealth coverage.
Why the study?
RFA and ICD implantation are recommended and effective for specific arrhythmias, but both procedures are expensive and usually beyond the reach of the average Filipino patient.
The actual hospitalization costs for RFA and ICD implantation in the Philippines vastly exceed current PhilHealth coverage, highlighting a need for revised benefit packages to improve equitable access to these life-saving procedures.
Current PhilHealth coverage may restrict access to RFA and ICD; leaves open optimal benefit revisions for equitable care.
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the recommended treatment of choice for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), whereas implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is recommended for patients at high risk for sudden death due to ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation has been proven to improve the quality of life of patients with SVT, whereas an ICD has been shown to reduce mortality among patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. Both procedures are expensive and usually beyond the reach of the average Filipino patient. OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to (1) determine the cost of hospitalization for cardiac arrhythmias that require RFA and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in the Philippines, (2) propose revised Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) benefit packages for both procedures, and (3) determine the budget impact of the proposed revised packages. METHODS: Hospitalization costs were obtained for both RFA and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation from two government tertiary care hospitals. A range of hospitalization costs involving possible lower and higher cost scenarios was estimated. Based on these estimates and the yearly number of arrhythmias that require these procedures, revised benefit packages for both RFA and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation were proposed to PhilHealth. The budget impact analysis for the first 3 and 5 years of implementation of these revised packages was subsequently calculated. RESULTS: The estimated hospitalization costs for RFA ranged from Philippine pesos (PHP) 248,485 to 310,480, whereas for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, the costs ranged from PHP 509,122 to 581,940. These amounts are greatly disparate from the present PhilHealth coverages, which are PHP 9700 and 18,000 for RFA and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, respectively. Based on these hospitalization costs, the proposed RFA benefit package is PHP 275,000 to 310,000, whereas for an ICD benefit package, PHP 513,000 to 576,000 is proposed. The incremental cost of more than PHP 300 million for RFA and more than PHP 700 million for an ICD is distributed for the next 3 or 5 years of implementation for these benefit packages, respectively. CONCLUSION: The present PhilHealth case rates for both RFA and cardioverter-defibrillator implantation are greatly underestimated, which probably is the reason for their underutilization. There is a need to revise these case rates with due consideration of their actual hospitalization costs to lessen inequity in accessing these procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tumanan-Mendoza et al. (2021) studied Cardiac arrhythmias requiring radiofrequency ablation or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Radiofrequency ablation and Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was evaluated on Hospitalization costs. The estimated hospitalization costs for radiofrequency ablation (PHP 248,485-310,480) and ICD implantation (PHP 509,122-581,940) greatly exceed current PhilHealth coverages of PHP 9,700 and 18,000.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: