Key result
Reclassifying surgical complications as surgical errors and adverse outcomes may improve grading and error avoidance.
Why the study?
The term surgical complication is confusing with multiple meanings, grading is difficult without established grades, and patient perspectives and surgeon responses to error and adverse outcomes are not well understood.
Proposes separating the term 'surgical complications' into 'surgical errors' and 'adverse surgical outcomes' to better understand and manage patient and surgeon perspectives.
Refining surgical terminology may clarify error perspectives; leaves open validation of grading and avoidance benefits in practice.
Complications are a recognized hazard of surgery. The term is confusing; it has multiple meanings, including surgical error and adverse surgical outcomes. I propose the latter two terms are used. Grading of ‘complications’ is difficult but made easier by grading errors and outcomes separately, though they are not always linked. The exact grades are not established. Error avoidance requires efforts at a personal (surgeon) level, including training, learning and preparation, and at a systems level. Understanding human factors is important. The perspective of patients about adverse outcomes is not well understood. There is evidence that, unsurprisingly, patient perspectives may be different to surgeon perspectives. There are a range of surgeon responses to error and adverse outcomes; many are negative. These need to be understood better in order to protect patients and surgeons in the immediate aftermath and in the potentially prolonged ‘recovery time’, both for patients and surgeons. Level of evidence: V
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grey Giddins (2024) conducted a review in Surgical complications. Replacing the confusing term 'surgical complications' with 'surgical error' and 'adverse surgical outcomes' may improve grading, error avoidance, and understanding of patient and surgeon perspectives.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: