Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this essay we argue for a more person-centric direction for research in industrial–organizational (I–O) psychology. We argue that the prevailing paradigm within I–O treats workers as objects and in so doing limits the ability to develop a deep and continued understanding of the important ways in which humans relate to work. In response, we think there is a need for a more coherent focus on the worker and on the subjective experience of working. After describing the current paradigm we suggest an alternative—a person-centric work psychology that takes the worker as its focus and worker experience as a topic of study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiss et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: