Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this paper is to set forth a sense in which programs can and do explain behavior, and to distinguish from this a number of senses in which they do not. Once we are tolerably clear concerning the sort of explanatory strategy being employed, two rather interesting facts emerge; (1) though it is true that programs are “internally represented,” this fact has no explanatory interest beyond the mere fact that the program is executed; (2) programs which are couched in information processing terms may have an explanatory interest for a given range of behavior which is independent of physiological explanations of the same range of behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Cummins (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: