Key result
SORG algorithm shows strong discrimination for nonhome discharge after lumbar surgery but lacks clinical utility.
Why the study?
Protracted admissions after lumbar surgeries are rising due to inefficient identification of patients needing nonhome discharge, prompting evaluation of the SORG machine learning algorithm in an independent cohort.
Does the SORG machine learning algorithm accurately predict nonhome discharge in adult patients undergoing elective lumbar surgery?
Cohort (n=251)
No
Does the SORG machine learning algorithm accurately predict nonhome discharge in adult patients undergoing elective lumbar surgery?
Effect estimate: c-statistic 0.88
The SORG machine learning algorithm showed strong discrimination but poor calibration and overestimation of nonhome discharges in a UK lumbar surgery cohort, limiting its clinical utility without geographic recalibration.
Should not yet guide discharge planning; leaves open the need for geographic recalibration of ML models.
Protracted admissions following lumbar surgeries are rising, often stemming from inefficient identification of patients requiring nonhome discharge for rehabilitation. The SORG Orthopaedic Research Group at Harvard Medical School have developed a machine learning algorithm for predicting discharge following lumbar surgery. This study assessed its predictive performance on an independent tertiary centre patient cohort. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for all elective adult lumbar disc degeneration or herniation surgeries performed between July 2017–2021 at a tertiary neurosurgical centre in the United Kingdom. Preoperative variables were collated and discharge destinations noted. Algorithm predictions were analysed using the concordance (c) statistic, Brier score and calibration plot. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were calculated, and a decision curve analysis (DCA) plotted. 251 subjects were included (48.2 % female, mean age 55.3 years). 2.8 % underwent nonhome discharge. Most had surgery at 1/2 spinal levels (98.4 %) and were functionally independent (84.5 %). Algorithm predictions yielded a 0.88 c-statistic and 0.029 Brier score. The algorithm was miscalibrated to the data (calibration plot slope 1.31 and intercept -1.12). At a 0.25 threshold for nonroutine discharge risk, the PPV was 0.19 and NPV 0.98. DCA revealed limited clinical utility. Algorithm predictive performance was mixed for this cohort, displaying strong discrimination but poor calibration and overestimation of nonroutine discharges. Differences in patient management practices and the low nonhome discharge rate may explain this. Larger validation studies across different healthcare systems, alongside geographically specific algorithm development, will improve predictive accuracy prior to clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salim et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in lumbar disc degeneration or herniation (n=251). SORG machine learning algorithm was evaluated on predictive performance for nonhome discharge (c-statistic 0.88). The SORG machine learning algorithm for predicting nonhome discharge following lumbar surgery demonstrated strong discrimination (c-statistic 0.88) but poor calibration and limited clinical utility.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: