Key result
Risk prediction models using administrative data predicted in-hospital death with similar discrimination to clinical databases across multiple procedures (e.g., ROC 0.77 vs 0.78 for isolated CABG).
Why the study?
Do risk prediction models based on administrative data perform comparably to those based on clinical databases for predicting in-hospital death in patients undergoing major surgery?
Population
341,379 patients admitted to NHS hospitals in England for isolated coronary artery bypass graft, repair of…
Comparison
Risk prediction models for death in hospital… vs Risk prediction models based on national…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
In-hospital
Authors
Loading...
Administrative data models may support mortality prediction in surgery; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Observational (n=341,379)
Yes
Do risk prediction models based on administrative data perform comparably to those based on clinical databases for predicting in-hospital death in patients undergoing major surgery?
Routinely collected administrative data can predict in-hospital mortality risk with similar discrimination to dedicated clinical databases for major surgical procedures.
Aylin et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Isolated CABG, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and colorectal excision for cancer (n=341,379). Administrative database risk prediction models vs. Clinical database risk prediction models was evaluated on Deaths in hospital. Risk prediction models using administrative data predicted in-hospital death with similar discrimination to clinical databases across multiple procedures (e.g., ROC 0.77 vs 0.78 for isolated CABG).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: