Key result
Aqueous iodine (2%) applied to the fingers effectively blocked transmission of experimental rhinovirus infection immediately after treatment (0% vs 100% infection rate; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does aqueous iodine applied to fingers prevent experimental rhinovirus infection in volunteers?
RCT (n=35)
Does aqueous iodine applied to fingers prevent experimental rhinovirus infection in volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 100%
p-value: p=<0.001
Aqueous iodine applied to the fingers effectively blocks hand transmission of experimental rhinovirus infection.
May support iodine-based hand disinfection against rhinovirus; leaves open real-world effectiveness and safety.
Aqueous iodine (2%) applied to the fingers was effective in blocking had transmission of experimental rhinovirus infection. None of eight volunteers became infected when exposed to rhinovirus immediately after treatment of the fingers with iodine. All of seven similarly exposed subjects treated with a placebo preparation became infected (P less than 0.001, Fisher's exact test). One of 10 volunteers became infected when exposed 2 hr after treatment of fingers with iodine, compared with six of 10 who became infected in the control group (P = 0.06, Fisher's exact test). Virus was recovered from three (11%) of 27 hand rinses from volunteers using iodine and from 11 (41%) of 27 hand rinses from volunteers using the placebo preparation (P less than 0.03), Fisher's exact test).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gwaltney et al. (1980) conducted an RCT in Experimental rhinovirus infection (n=35). Aqueous iodine applied to the fingers vs. Placebo preparation was evaluated on Rhinovirus infection after immediate exposure (p=<0.001). Aqueous iodine (2%) applied to the fingers effectively blocked transmission of experimental rhinovirus infection immediately after treatment (0% vs 100% infection rate; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: