Key result
Lower income without a college degree linked to ~6.5-fold higher CHF odds versus top earners.
Why the study?
US health metrics lag behind other high-income nations with persistent sociodemographic gaps, and top income earners and college graduates have increasingly diverged from the general population.
Does lower income and educational attainment increase the risk of cardiovascular disease outcomes in US adults?
Observational (n=49,704)
Does lower income and educational attainment increase the risk of cardiovascular disease outcomes in US adults?
Effect estimate: OR 6.52 (95% CI 4.28-9.93)
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 0.5%
p-value: p=<0.0001
There is a socio-economic clustering of protective factors for cardiovascular health among a small group of Americans (top 20% income, college graduates), leaving the majority with significantly higher odds of adverse CVD outcomes.
Background: Health metrics in the United States (US) have lagged behind other high-income countries in recent decades, and show persistent gaps between socio-demographic groups. Top 20% income earners and college graduates have also increasingly diverged from the reminder of the population in various dimensions over the past few decades. This study described population patterns in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) by income and education over a twenty-year period. Methods: This analysis used nationally representative data from 10 cycles (1999-2018) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants were stratified by income and education into four groups: top 20% income earners, college graduates; top 20% income earners, non-college graduates; bottom 80% income earners, college graduates; and bottom 80% income earners, non-college graduates. For income, we created a binary variable (ratio > 5 cutoff) using NHANES income-to-poverty ratio variable to create a standardized measure of income. We calculated the age-standardized prevalence and odds ratios of four conditions: congestive heart failure (CHF), angina, heart attack, and stroke, for each income-education group. Findings: 49,704 participants reported data for both income and education. The age-standardized prevalence of CVD outcomes varied across the four groups. This was most significant when comparing the prevalence among the top 20% income, college graduate group to the bottom 80% income, non-college graduate group: CHF (0.5% vs. 3.0%), angina (1.4% vs. 2.8%), heart attack (1.7% vs. 3.9%), and stroke (1.1% vs. 3.4%). Compared to the top 20% income, college graduate group, the odds of all CVD conditions were significantly higher in the bottom 80% income groups (college graduates: odds ratios (ORs) 1.48-3.67; non-college graduates: ORs 2.36-6.52), as well as for CHF and heart attack in the top 20% income, non-college graduates (OR 3.11 [95% CI: 1.92, 5.06] and OR 1.92 [95% CI: 1.35, 2.73], respectively). Interpretation: Health gaps extend beyond extremes, with risk clustering favoring top 20% income earners with college degrees while most Americans are left behind. Future research should include longitudinal studies that focus on the mechanisms through which both income and education intersect to shape CVD outcomes in the US. Funding: The Rockefeller Foundation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdalla et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease (n=49,704). Bottom 80% income, non-college graduates vs. Top 20% income, college graduates was evaluated on Congestive heart failure (OR 6.52, 95% CI 4.28-9.93, p=<0.0001). Adults in the bottom 80% income bracket without a college degree had significantly higher odds of congestive heart failure (OR 6.52) compared to top 20% income earners with a college degree.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: