PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2007Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise266 citations

Age and Gender Differences in Youth Physical Activity

View Full Paper
LSLauren B. SherarDEDale EsligerABAdam Baxter‐Jones

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether observed gender differences in objectively measured physical activity (PA) in children (8-13 yr) are confounded by physical maturity differences. METHODS: Four hundred and one children (194 boys and 207 girls) volunteered for this study. An Actigraph accelerometer was used to obtain seven consecutive days of minute-by-minute PA data for each participant. Minutes of moderate to vigorous PA per day (MVPA), continuous minutes of MVPA per day (CMVPA), and minutes of vigorous PA per day (VPA) were derived from the accelerometer data. Age at peak height velocity (APHV), an indicator of somatic maturity, was predicted in all individuals. Gender differences in the PA variables were analyzed using a two-way (gender x age) ANOVA. RESULTS: Levels of PA decreased with increasing chronological age in both genders (P < 0.05). When aligned on chronological age, boys had a higher MVPA at 10-13 yr, a higher CMVPA at 9-12 yr, and a higher VPA at 9-13 yr (P < 0.05). When aligned on biological age, PA declined with increasing maturity (P < 0.05); however, gender differences between biological age groups disappeared. CONCLUSION: The observed age-related decline in adolescent boys and girls PA is antithetical to public health goals; as such, it is an important area of research. To fully understand gender disparities in PA, consideration must be given to the confounding effects of physical maturity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sherar et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0b23061b870d7e582e3775https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3180335c3c
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper