Key result
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators reduced all-cause mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.32-1.01; P=0.053) when implanted after a sufficient time-gap.
Why the study?
Survivors of acute myocardial infarction are at high risk of sudden cardiac death from arrhythmias and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction, leading to evaluation of cardioverter defibrillators.
Does an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduce all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac death in survivors of acute myocardial infarction?
Systematic Review
Does an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduce all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac death in survivors of acute myocardial infarction?
Effect estimate: HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.32-1.01)
p-value: p=0.053
ICD implantation reduces all-cause mortality and sudden cardiac death in post-MI patients, provided there is a sufficient time-gap after the index infarction.
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for approximately half of all the deaths attributed to cardiovascular disease in the United States. Survivors of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are at high risk of SCD, largely due to cardiac arrhythmias and severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or automated implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) is a device that is implantable inside the body, able to perform cardioversion, defibrillation, and (in modern versions) pacing of the heart. According to a study included in our review, patients who received an ICD contributed to an adjusted 44% reduction (hazard ratio [HR] 0.56, 95% CI: 0.32-1.01; P = 0.053) of all-cause mortality compared to those with a comparable baseline. Patients with an ICD implant three months after a myocardial infarction (MI) demonstrated a non-significantly higher mortality than patients who did not receive an ICD. The factors favoring ICD implantation were multiple MIs, increased resting heart rate, occurrence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, QRS duration = 120 ms, syncope events, anti-arrhythmic drug treatment (mostly Class III), and an index MI of more than one year. The likelihood of receiving an ICD diminished with the patient's age. Increased periodic repolarization dynamics were a significant predictor of mortality. It can be concluded that cardioverter defibrillators help reduce not only all-cause mortality but also sudden cardiac death. It is important to note that ICDs are only significant if implanted after a sufficient time-gap post-MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maqsood et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review in Post-myocardial infarction sudden cardiac death. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) vs. No ICD / comparable baseline was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-1.01, p=0.053). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators reduced all-cause mortality in post-myocardial infarction patients (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.32-1.01; P=0.053) when implanted after a sufficient time-gap.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: