PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1993CirculationOpen Access

Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Does three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping visualize helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch in healthy volunteers?

Population

10 healthy volunteers and a curved tubular phantom

Design

Cross-sectional

Key result

Three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping showed right-handed helical flows in the upper aortic arch in late systole in 9 of 10 healthy subjects, with nonaxial velocities up to 0.29 m/s.

Authors

PKPhilip J. KilnerGYGuang YangRMRaad Mohiaddin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Helical aortic flows appear physiologic on 3D MR mapping in volunteers; leaves open standardization and disease-state applications.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=10)

Structured PICO

Does three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping visualize helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch in healthy volunteers?

P
Population
10 healthy volunteers and a curved tubular phantom
I
Intervention
Three-directional phase contrast cine magnetic resonance velocity mapping
O
Outcome
Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic archsurrogate

Helical and retrograde streams are consistent features of intra-aortic flow in healthy subjects, likely resulting from arch curvature and flow pulsatility.

Cite This Study

Kilner et al. (1993) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=10). Three-directional phase contrast cine magnetic resonance velocity mapping was evaluated on Multidirectional flow velocities and flow vector patterns in the aorta. Three-directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping showed right-handed helical flows in the upper aortic arch in late systole in 9 of 10 healthy subjects, with nonaxial velocities up to 0.29 m/s.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0b45ca393ef274532e1c90https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.5.2235
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share