Key result
INLA and MLMM algorithms predict yearly OHCA, STEMI, and stroke incidence with high accuracy.
Why the study?
Predicting the incidence of time-sensitive cardiovascular diseases such as OHCA, STEMI, and stroke can reduce time to treatment and improve outcomes.
Do INLA and MLMM prediction algorithms accurately predict the spatio-temporal incidence of OHCA, STEMI, and stroke compared to Naïve forecasting and exponential moving average?
Observational (n=8,604)
Do INLA and MLMM prediction algorithms accurately predict the spatio-temporal incidence of OHCA, STEMI, and stroke compared to Naïve forecasting and exponential moving average?
Advanced prediction algorithms like INLA and MLMM can accurately forecast the spatio-temporal incidence of major acute cardiovascular events, which may help optimize resource allocation.
May aid municipal planning for OHCA, STEMI, and stroke; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact.
Background: Predicting the incidence of time-sensitive cardiovascular diseases like out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and stroke can reduce time to treatment and improve outcomes. This study analysed the spatio-temporal distribution of OHCAs, STEMIs, and strokes, their spatio-temporal correlation, and the performance of different prediction algorithms. Methods: Adults who experienced an OHCA, STEMI, or stroke in Canton Ticino, Switzerland from 2005 to 2022 were included. Datasets were divided into training and validation samples. To estimate and predict the yearly per-capita population incidences of OHCA, STEMI, and stroke, the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA), machine learning meta model (MLMM), the Naïve prediction method, and the exponential moving average were employed and compared. The relationship between OHCA, STEMI, and stroke was assessed by predicting the incidence of one condition, considering the lagged incidence of the other two as explanatory variables. Results: We included 3,906 OHCAs, 2,162 STEMIs, and 2,536 stroke patients. INLA and MLMM yearly predicted incidence OHCA, STEMI, and stroke at municipality level with very high accuracy, outperforming the Naïve forecasting and the exponential moving average. INLA exhibited errors of zero or one event in 82%, 87%, and 72% of municipalities for OHCA, STEMI, and stroke, respectively, whereas ML had errors in 81%, 89%, and 71% of municipalities for the same conditions. INLA had a prediction error of 0.87, 0.77, and 1.50 events per year per municipality for OHCA, STEMI and stroke, whereas MLMM of 0.70, 0.74, and 1.09 events, respectively. Including in the INLA model the lagged absolute values of the other conditions as covariates improved the prediction of OHCA and stroke but not STEMI. MLMM predictions were consistently the most accurate and did not benefit from the inclusion of the other conditions as covariates. All the three diseases showed a similar spatial pattern. Conclusions: Prediction of incidence of OHCA, STEMI, and stroke is possible with very high accuracy using INLA and MLMM models. A robust spatio-temporal correlation between the 3 pathologies exists. Widespread implementation in clinical practice of prediction algorithms may allow to improve resource allocation, reduce treatment delays, and improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Auricchio et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and stroke (n=8,604). Integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) and machine learning meta model (MLMM) vs. Naïve prediction method and exponential moving average was evaluated on Prediction error of yearly per-capita population incidences of OHCA, STEMI, and stroke at municipality level. INLA and MLMM algorithms predicted the yearly incidence of OHCA, STEMI, and stroke with high accuracy, achieving MLMM prediction errors of 0.70, 0.74, and 1.09 events per year per municipality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: