Key result
Wild-type HSV-1 DNA polymerase exhibits 3′-to-5′ RNase H activity absent in exonuclease-deficient mutants.
HSV-1 Pol RNase H activity is not separable from its 3′-to-5′ exonuclease activity and acts only in a 3′-to-5′ direction.
HSV-1 Pol RNase H activity requires intact 3'-5' exonuclease function; leaves open antiviral targeting strategies.
The catalytic subunit (Pol) of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) DNA polymerase has been extensively studied both as a model for other family B DNA polymerases and for its differences from these enzymes as an antiviral target. Among the activities of HSV-1 Pol is an intrinsic RNase H activity that cleaves RNA from RNA-DNA hybrids. There has long been a controversy regarding whether this activity is due to the 3′-to-5′ exonuclease of Pol or whether it is a separate activity, possibly acting on 5′ RNA termini. To investigate this issue, we compared wild-type HSV-1 Pol and a 3′-to-5′ exonuclease-deficient mutant, D368A Pol, for DNA polymerase activity, 3′-to-5′ exonuclease activity, and RNase H activity in vitro . Additionally, we assessed the RNase H activity using differentially end-labeled templates with 5′ or 3′ RNA termini. The mutant enzyme was at most modestly impaired for DNA polymerase activity but was drastically impaired for 3′-to-5′ exonuclease activity, with no activity detected even at high enzyme-to-DNA substrate ratios. Importantly, the mutant showed no detectable ability to excise RNA with either a 3′ or 5′ terminus, while the wild-type HSV-1 Pol was able to cleave RNA from the annealed RNA-DNA hairpin template, but only detectably with a 3′ RNA terminus in a 3′-to-5′ direction and at a rate lower than that of the exonuclease activity. These results suggest that HSV-1 Pol does not have an RNase H separable from its 3′-to-5′ exonuclease activity and that this activity prefers DNA degradation over degradation of RNA from RNA-DNA hybrids. IMPORTANCE Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is a member of the Herpesviridae family of DNA viruses, several of which cause morbidity and mortality in humans. Although the HSV-1 DNA polymerase has been studied for decades and is a crucial target for antivirals against HSV-1 infection, several of its functions remain to be elucidated. A hypothesis suggesting the existence of a 5′-to-3′ RNase H activity intrinsic to this enzyme that could remove RNA primers from Okazaki fragments has been particularly controversial. In this study, we were unable to identify RNase H activity of HSV-1 DNA polymerase on RNA-DNA hybrids with 5′ RNA termini. We detected RNase H activity on hybrids with 3′ termini, but this was due to the 3′-to-5′ exonuclease. Thus, HSV-1 is unlikely to use this method to remove RNA primers during DNA replication but may use pathways similar to those used in eukaryotic Okazaki fragment maturation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawler et al. (2017) studied Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1). Wild-type HSV-1 Pol vs. 3′-to-5′ exonuclease-deficient mutant, D368A Pol was evaluated on RNase H activity and 3′-to-5′ exonuclease activity. Wild-type HSV-1 DNA polymerase exhibited RNase H activity only with a 3′ RNA terminus in a 3′-to-5′ direction, which was absent in the 3′-to-5′ exonuclease-deficient mutant D368A Pol.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: