In the canine epicardium, excitation spread is 2.4 times faster, tissue resistivity is 3.2 times lower, and depolarization voltage is 3 times greater parallel to cardiac fibers than perpendicular.
Cardiac electrophysiology
Epicardial stimulation parallel to cardiac fibers vs Stimulation perpendicular to cardiac fibers
Spread of epicardial excitation, tissue resistivity, and voltage across depolarization wave
When the canine epicardium is stimulated, the spread of epicardial excitation is 2.4 times faster parallel to the long axes of the cardiac fibers than perpendicular to them. Likewise, gross tissue resistivity is lower parallel to fibers by a factor of 3.2, and the voltage across the depolarization wave is approximately three times as great in the longitudinal direction. Equations are presented which relate these variables. Theoretical considerations confirm the experimental finding that the potentials around a wave of depolarization cannot be accounted for by the conventional hypothesis that the wavefront is a uniform double-layer current source.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Roberts et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Cardiac electrophysiology. Epicardial stimulation parallel to cardiac fibers vs. Stimulation perpendicular to cardiac fibers was evaluated on Spread of epicardial excitation, tissue resistivity, and voltage across depolarization wave. In the canine epicardium, excitation spread is 2.4 times faster, tissue resistivity is 3.2 times lower, and depolarization voltage is 3 times greater parallel to cardiac fibers than perpendicular.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ba8a14f6759c6fca253a6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.44.5.701
Donald E. Roberts
University of Michigan
Lawrence T. Hersh
Duke University
A. M. Scher
University of Washington
Circulation Research
University of Washington
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...