Key result
Early ventricular repolarization is not linked to increased mortality or ventricular arrhythmias versus controls.
Why the study?
Early repolarization has been linked to increased ventricular fibrillation risk, but data on its impact on mortality and ventricular arrhythmias in the Brazilian population are limited.
Does the type of early repolarization affect the risk of ventricular arrhythmias or all-cause mortality in a Brazilian cohort?
Cohort (n=2,172)
No
Does the type of early repolarization affect the risk of ventricular arrhythmias or all-cause mortality in a Brazilian cohort?
In a Brazilian cohort, early repolarization on ECG was not associated with a higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias or all-cause mortality over a 10-year period.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early repolarization was not linked to higher VA or mortality risk in this cohort; leaves open its prognostic value pending larger prospective studies.
Background Recent research has linked early repolarization (ER) with increased ventricular fibrillation risk, especially in leads V1-V3 and in inferior and lateral regions. However, data on the Brazilian population are limited. Objective To estimate the impact of ER on survival and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients over a 10-year period at a university hospital. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients with ER on electrocardiogram from the hospital database. Descriptive analysis was conducted to describe patients’ profile and characteristics. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to analyze survival curves, with the log-rank test employed to assess differences between ER types. Cox regression models were applied to evaluate the risks of death and VA, calculating both gross and adjusted hazard ratios. The level of significance adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. Results The study population was predominantly male, average age of 45.6 years; 2.7% experienced VA (five in the group with lateral ER, four in the group with inferior ER group, and four in the ER inferolateral group). Significant differences were observed in age, sex, and HFrEF between the groups. Regarding all-cause mortality, 2.3% of patients died (five in the group with lateral ER, one in the group with inferior ER group, and five in the ER inferolateral group). Only age showed a statistically significant difference. There were significant differences in both death and VA between the groups (p=0.7 and p=0.5, respectively). Conclusion ER did not lead to a higher incidence of VA or all-cause mortality in this cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baldisserotto et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Early Ventricular Repolarization (n=2,172). Early Ventricular Repolarization vs. No Early Repolarization was evaluated on All-cause mortality (p=0.7). Early ventricular repolarization did not significantly increase the incidence of all-cause mortality or ventricular arrhythmias compared to controls over a 10-year period.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: