Key result
Global J waves predict ~116% higher VF recurrence risk in J-wave syndrome.
Why the study?
Limited data were available regarding the long-term prognosis of patients with J-wave syndrome and the predictors of ventricular fibrillation recurrence.
Does the presence of global J waves predict the recurrence of ventricular fibrillation in patients with J-wave syndrome?
Cohort (n=134)
Yes
Does the presence of global J waves predict the recurrence of ventricular fibrillation in patients with J-wave syndrome?
Global J waves, rather than previously reported high-risk ECG parameters, predict long-term recurrence of ventricular fibrillation in patients with J-wave syndrome.
May aid VF risk stratification in J-wave syndrome; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before changing practice.
OBJECTIVE: Limited data are currently available regarding the long-term prognosis of patients with J-wave syndrome (JWS). The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term prognosis of patients with JWS and identify predictors of the recurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF). METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective study (seven Japanese hospitals) involving 134 patients with JWS (Brugada syndrome (BrS): 85; early repolarisation syndrome (ERS): 49) treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. All patients had a history of VF. All patients with ERS underwent drug provocation testing with standard and high intercostal ECG recordings to rule out BrS. The impact of global J waves (type 1 ECG or anterior J waves and inferolateral J waves in two or more leads) on the prognosis was evaluated. RESULTS: During the 91±66 months of the follow-up period, 52 (39%) patients (BrS: 37; ERS: 15) experienced recurrence of VF. Patients with BrS and ERS with global J waves showed a significantly higher incidence of VF recurrence than those without (BrS: log-rank, p=0.014; ERS: log-rank, p=0.0009). The presence of global J waves was a predictor of VF recurrence in patients with JWS (HR: 2.16, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.91, p=0.0095), while previously reported high-risk electrocardiographic parameters (high-amplitude J waves ≥0.2 mV and J waves associated with a horizontal or descending ST segment) were not predictive of VF recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre long-term study showed that the presence of global J waves was associated with a higher incidence of VF recurrence in patients with JWS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamakura et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in J-wave syndrome (n=134). Global J waves vs. Absence of global J waves was evaluated on Recurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.91, p=0.0095). The presence of global J waves was a significant predictor of ventricular fibrillation recurrence in patients with J-wave syndrome (HR 2.16; 95% CI 1.21-3.91; p=0.0095).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: