Key result
Planned RCT evaluates a 12-week HAPA-based motivational intervention to improve physical activity in CHD patients.
Why the study?
Physical activity is recommended for secondary prevention in coronary heart disease, but many patients in Sri Lanka do not engage in adequate physical activity.
Does a culture-specific, motivated, action-based intervention improve physical activity levels, exercise self-efficacy, and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease?
Population
150 patients with CHD from an inpatient cardiac unit in Batticaloa, Sri Lanka
Comparison
Culture-specific, motivated, action-based intervention plus usual care vs usual care alone
Design
Assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial protocol
Authors
Loading...
Awaits completion before guiding culture-specific PA promotion in CHD; extends HAPA testing to South Asian populations.
RCT (n=150)
Assessor-blinded
Block randomization
No
Does a culture-specific, motivated, action-based intervention improve physical activity levels, exercise self-efficacy, and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease?
This protocol outlines an assessor-blinded RCT to evaluate a culture-specific, motivated, action-based intervention for improving physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors in Sri Lankan patients with coronary heart disease.
Karthijekan et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease (n=150). Motivated, action-based intervention (HAPA framework) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Physical activity level (measured by IPAQ-SF). A 12-week motivated, action-based intervention based on the HAPA framework is planned to be evaluated for its effectiveness in improving physical activity among patients with coronary heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: