PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 31, 2011Heart568 citations

Independent prognostic value of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure. A quantitative analysis of 1256 patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy

View Full Paper
ARAndrea RossiFDFrank Loyd DiniPFPompilio Faggiano

Key Points

  • To assess the prognostic significance of functional mitral regurgitation in heart failure patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of 1256 heart failure patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Structured PICO

Does severe functional mitral regurgitation worsen the composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for worsening HF in patients with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy?

P
Population
1256 patients with heart failure due to ischaemic and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), mean age 67 ± 11, 78% male.
I
Intervention
Severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), quantitatively defined as effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) >0.2 cm², regurgitant volume (RV) >30 ml, or vena contracta (VC) >0.4 cm
C
Comparator
No FMR or mild to moderate FMR
O
Outcome
Composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for worsening HFcomposite

Quantitatively defined severe functional mitral regurgitation is an independent predictor of mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, regardless of ischemic or non-ischemic etiology.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a common finding in patients with heart failure (HF), but its effect on outcome is still uncertain, mainly because in previous studies sample sizes were relatively small and semiquantitative methods for FMR grading were used. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of FMR in patients with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HF due to ischaemic and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) were retrospectively recruited. The clinical end point was a composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for worsening HF. FMR was quantitatively determined by measuring vena contracta (VC) or effective regurgitant orifice (ERO) or regurgitant volume (RV). Severe FMR was defined as ERO >0.2 cm(2) or RV >30 ml or VC >0.4 cm. Restrictive mitral filling pattern (RMP) was defined as E-wave deceleration time <140 ms. The study population comprised 1256 patients (mean age 67 ± 11; 78% male) with HF due to DCM: 27% had no FMR, 49% mild to moderate FMR and 24% severe FMR. There was a powerful association between severe FMR and prognosis (HR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 2.6; p<0.0001) after adjustment of left ventricular ejection fraction and RMP. The independent association of severe FMR with prognosis was confirmed in patients with ischaemic DCM (HR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.7; p<0.0001) and non-ischaemic DCM (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.9; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In a large patient population it was shown that a quantitatively defined FMR was strongly associated with the outcome of patients with HF, independently of LV function.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rossi et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0bd7dfdc69176b05a94172https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2011.225789
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper