Key result
Assessing FMR proportionality is feasible in ~44% of MitraClip patients, with disproportionate cases trending worse.
Why the study?
Functional mitral regurgitation proportionality relative to left ventricular function and volume could help identify responders to MitraClip in terms of residual regurgitation or clinical improvement.
Does functional mitral regurgitation proportionality predict response to transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=36)
No
Does functional mitral regurgitation proportionality predict response to transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction?
Determining functional mitral regurgitation proportionality in real-world practice is challenging due to missing echocardiographic parameters, but disproportionate FMR appears associated with worse baseline left ventricular function, conduction disorders, and less FMR reduction post-procedure.
BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) can be subclassified based on its proportionality relative to left ventricular function and end-diastolic volume. FMR proportionality could help identify responders to transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (MitraClip) in terms of residual FMR and/or clinical improvement. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective cohort study evaluated the feasibility of determining FMR proportionality in symptomatic heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular function who were treated with MitraClip for ≥ moderate-to-severe FMR. Baseline proportionate (pFMR) and disproportionate FMR (dFMR) were distinguished. Patient characteristics and MitraClip procedural outcomes were described. RESULTS: From an overall cohort of 81 eligible FMR patients, 23/81 (28%) had to be excluded due to missing transthoracic echocardiogram parameters, 22/81 were excluded based on FMR severity. The remaining cohort, of 36/81 patients (44%), could be classified into dFMR (n = 26) or pFMR (n = 10). Conduction disorders were numerically increased in dFMR. All cases requiring > 2 clips were in the dFMR group and absence of FMR reduction occurred more frequently with dFMR. POINT OF VIEW/CONCLUSION: Important limitations in terms of imaging acquisition affect the translation of the FMR proportionality concept to a real-world data set. We did observe different demographic and FMR response patterns in patients with proportionate and disproportionate FMR that warrant further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ooms et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and heart failure (n=36). MitraClip (Disproportionate FMR group) vs. MitraClip (Proportionate FMR group) was evaluated on Absence of FMR reduction at discharge. In a real-world cohort of patients undergoing MitraClip for functional mitral regurgitation, determining FMR proportionality was feasible in only 44% of patients, with disproportionate FMR showing a trend toward less FMR reduction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: