Key result
Review reveals severe insufficiencies in anaesthesia workforce, infrastructure, and supplies across lower-income Asian countries.
Why the study?
Literature on anaesthesia systems in low and lower-middle-income countries is limited, focused on Africa, and provides minimal data on anaesthesia or associated disciplines.
There is an urgent need for additional research and collaboration to strengthen anaesthesia delivery and surgical facilities in resource-constrained Asian settings.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Literature on anaesthesia systems in low and lower middle-income countries is limited, focused on the Africa region, and provides minimal data on anaesthesia or associated disciplines within intensive care, pain management and emergency medicine. We thus conducted a review of primary and secondary research literature on low and lower middle-income countries in the Asia region from 2000-2021, to clarify existing knowledge, important gaps, and possible subsequent steps. Methods We applied Arksey and O"Malley"s scoping literature review method to search, screen, extract, and synthesise data under three themes: (i) availability and type of anaesthesia workforce; (ii) anaesthesia system infrastructure, equipment, and supplies; and (iii) effectiveness of anaesthesia provision. Results We included 25 eligible sources of 603 identified. Only ten (40%) were published in the last 5 years and Asian lower-income countries were primarily represented in 15 multi-country sources. Fifteen (60%) sources used quantitative methods and provided limited information on data collection, e.g. sampling criteria or geographic areas included. No sources included countrywide data, despite anaesthesia delivery and resources differing significantly sub-nationally (e.g., central versus rural/remote, or insecure areas). Data on anaesthesiology delivery were limited, with findings including insufficiencies in workforce, supplies, training and skills-building of anaesthesia personnel, along with the lack of consistent strategies for overcoming maldistribution of resources and improving anaesthesia delivery systems in the region. Conclusions This review, a first attempt to synthesise existing data on anaesthesia delivery systems in low and lower-middle-income Asian countries, shows the anaesthesia literature is still limited. Findings highlight the urgent need for additional research and collaboration nationally and regionally to strengthen anaesthesia delivery and surgical facilities in resource-constrained settings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Signals critical anaesthesia shortfalls needing urgent redress in low-income Asia; leaves open scalable solutions requiring prospective evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahbaz et al. (2023) conducted a review in Anaesthesia delivery systems capacity and effectiveness (n=25). Anaesthesia delivery systems was evaluated. A scoping review of 25 sources revealed severe insufficiencies in anaesthesia workforce, infrastructure, and supplies across low and lower-middle-income Asian countries.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: