Investigates ovarian metabolism effects of long-term oral tamoxifen, suggesting new insights into reproductive biology.
Tamoxifen (TAM) is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) widely used as long-term chemotherapy for premenopausal women with estrogen-sensitive breast cancer. We developed a murine model of chronic TAM exposure by administering TAM admixed in mouse chow (TAM-chow), a less stressful and physiologically relevant alternative to daily gavage or injections. Mice received either 36mg/kg/day or 72mg/kg/day for 2 or 5 weeks. Body weights were monitored every 2-days; blood and tissue samples collected at endpoints. TAM and key metabolites (N-desmethyl-TAM (NDM-TAM), 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OH-TAM), and endoxifen isomers,) were quantified in serum and ovarian tissues using LC-MS/MS. The concentrations of TAM and metabolites showed dose-dependent trends: serum TAM levels increased with time, while ovarian levels remained relatively stable. Correlation analyses suggest that TAM, NDM-TAM, and Z-endoxifen are transported into the ovary with linear serum-ovary concentration relationships. 4-OH-TAM showed a significant monotonic association, but the relationship was not well described by a specific functional model. In contrast, E-endoxifen may reflect local ovarian metabolism involving CYP-mediated pathways. Estrogen receptor expression in ovarian tissue was dynamically regulated, where Esr1 increased significantly after 2-weeks and returned toward baseline by 5-weeks, while Esr2 showed a biphasic response with initial downregulation followed by upregulation at 5-weeks. Estrogen receptor Gpr30 was elevated across treatment groups, indicating sustained upregulation. Taken together, the TAM-chow model effectively simulates long-term oral TAM treatment, enabling detailed evaluation of ovarian TAM pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and estrogen signaling alterations. This approach offers a robust platform to study chronic TAM effects on female reproductive biology under clinically relevant conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGinnis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: